§

Albany Steel, Inc.

309 N.L.R.B. 442 (N.L.R.B. 1992)
Albany Steel, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.

    494 U.S. 775 (1990)   Cited 178 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board has "considerable deference" in determining the legal rule to apply and should be upheld "as long as it is rational and consistent with the Act"

  2. Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    454 U.S. 404 (1982)   Cited 116 times
    Holding that courts must not "substitute [their] judgment for those of the Board with respect to the issues that Congress intended the Board should resolve"

  3. Richmond Recording Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    836 F.2d 289 (7th Cir. 1987)   Cited 30 times
    Asserting that an impasse does not exist unless "[b]oth parties ... believe that they are at the end of their rope"

  4. Huck Mfg. Co. v. NLRB

    693 F.2d 1176 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 29 times
    Finding of no impasse supported by fact that "Union's chief negotiator testified that he never felt the parties were at an impasse"

  5. Gulf States Mfg. Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    704 F.2d 1390 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that an employer preserved an issue by ambiguously referencing the issue in a motion for reconsideration

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Middleboro Fire Apparatus, Inc.

    590 F.2d 4 (1st Cir. 1978)   Cited 17 times

    No. 78-1173. Argued October 4, 1978. Decided December 20, 1978. Alan Banov, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Peter M. Bernstein, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Lawrence M. Siskind, Brockton, Mass., with whom Ann-Louise Levine, Brockton, Mass., was on brief, for respondent. Petition from National Labor

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Phoenix Pipe Tube, L.P.

    955 F.2d 852 (3d Cir. 1991)   Cited 4 times

    No. 91-3269. Submitted Under Third Circuit Rule 12(6), December 12, 1991. Decided December 17, 1991. Jerry M. Hunter, D. Randall Frye, Aileen A. Armstrong, Charles Donnelly and David Seid, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Howard R. Flaxman, Blank, Rome, Comisky McCauley, Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent. Richard J. Brean, United Steelworkers of America, Pittsburgh, Pa., for amicus-petitioner, United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board

  8. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    859 F.2d 362 (5th Cir. 1988)   Cited 6 times
    In Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 859 F.2d 362 (5th Cir. 1989), a divided panel of this Court held that the NLRB did not have the authority to establish a rule of decision that employees hired as replacements for strikers in a lawful economic strike could not be presumed either to favor or oppose the union as a bargaining representative.

  9. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    906 F.2d 1428 (10th Cir. 1990)   Cited 3 times

    No. 88-2134. June 26, 1990. William J. Rodgers (Thomas G. Olp, Ross Hardies, Washington, D.C., with him on the brief), Ross Hardies, for petitioner. David A. Fleischer, Supervisory Atty. (Howard E. Perlstein, Rosemary M. Collyer, Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Jr., Associate Gen. Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, with him on the brief), N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before McKAY, MOORE, and ANDERSON