§

Albany Garage, Inc.

126 N.L.R.B. 417 (N.L.R.B. 1960)
Albany Garage, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Yawman & Erbe Mfg. Co.

    187 F.2d 947 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 34 times

    No. 107, Docket 21789. Argued February 7, 1951. Decided March 28, 1951. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and Raymond M. Norton, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Nixon, Hargrave, Middleton Devans, Rochester, N.Y., for respondent; Arthur L. Stern and William H. Morris, Rochester, N Y, of counsel. Before L. HAND, Chief Judge, and SWAN and FRANK,

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whitin Mach. Works

    217 F.2d 593 (4th Cir. 1954)   Cited 25 times

    No. 6883. November 18, 1954. Decided December 8, 1954. Frederick U. Reel, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, and James A. Ryan, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Whiteford S. Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C. (Pierce Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for respondent. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is a petition by the National Labor

  4. Boston Herald-Traveler Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    223 F.2d 58 (1st Cir. 1955)   Cited 23 times

    No. 4915. June 6, 1955. Frank W. Crocker, Boston, Mass., with whom Levin H. Campbell, III, and Ropes, Gray, Best, Coolidge Rugg, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for petitioner. Elizabeth W. Weston, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and William J. Avrutis, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. MAGRUDER, Chief Judge. Petitioner

  5. Taylor Forge Pipe Works v. N.L.R.B

    234 F.2d 227 (7th Cir. 1956)   Cited 16 times

    No. 11617. June 6, 1956. Robert W. MacDonald, Henry E. Seyfarth, Lee C. Shaw, Owen Fairweather, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Mozart G. Ratner, Jacobs, Kamin Ratner, Chicago, Ill., for Forge and Machine Workers

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.

    235 F.2d 319 (9th Cir. 1956)   Cited 14 times

    No. 14577. June 25, 1956. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Edward D. Friedman, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Daniel J. Harrington, Atty., N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Davies, Hardy Schenck, Christopher W. Hoey, New York City, George O. Bahrs, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before STEPHENS, FEE and CHAMBERS, Circuit Judges. CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge. Herein we have a question of whether the Woolworth

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    224 F.2d 869 (4th Cir. 1955)   Cited 2 times

    No. 6989. Argued June 15, 1955. Decided July 30, 1955. Duane Beeson, Atty. National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Chicago, Ill., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. R.D. Douglas, Jr., Greensboro, N.C., and Whiteford S. Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C. (Douglas, Douglas Ravenel, Greensboro, N.C., and Pierce

  8. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"