§

Alan Ritchey, Inc.

354 N.L.R.B. 628 (N.L.R.B. 2009)
Alan Ritchey, Inc.

17 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  4. Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    441 U.S. 488 (1979)   Cited 288 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that proposal concerning in-plant cafeteria prices was within duty to bargain despite fact that prices were set by third-party supplier rather than employer

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  6. Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    466 F.2d 380 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 157 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Declining to enforce Board order giving retroactive effect to rule newly announced in adjudication

  7. Laurel Baye Healthcare of Lake Lanier, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    564 F.3d 469 (D.C. Cir. 2009)   Cited 30 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that two-member NLRB cannot issue decisions

  8. Snell Island SNF LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    568 F.3d 410 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 19 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Snell Island SNF LLC v. National Labor Relations Board, 568 F.3d 410 (2d Cir. 2009), we held that two Board members may exercise the Board's authority in such circumstances as a quorum of a three-member delegate group, overridden that holding in New Process Steel, L.P. v. National Labor Relations Board, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 2635, ___ L.Ed.2d ___, 2010 WL 2400089 (2010).

  9. New Process Steel, L.P. v. N.L.R.B

    564 F.3d 840 (7th Cir. 2009)   Cited 15 times   4 Legal Analyses
    In New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, 564 F.3d 840 (7th Cir. 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit concluded that a two-member panel of the NLRB — the same panel that adjudicated the instant case — "had authority to hear the labor dispute," id. at 848.

  10. Northeastern Land v. National Labor Relations

    560 F.3d 36 (1st Cir. 2009)   Cited 14 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Northeastern Land Services v. NLRB, 560 F.3d 36 (1st Cir. 2009), the court held that, "[t]he Board's delegation of its institutional power to a panel that ultimately consisted of a two-member quorum because of a vacancy was lawful under the plain text of section 3(b)."