§

Alabama Tourism Department

87599292 (T.T.A.B. May. 6, 2020)
Alabama Tourism Department

11 Cited authorities

  1. In re Int'l Flavors Fragrances Inc.

    183 F.3d 1361 (Fed. Cir. 1999)   Cited 60 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Noting that "[t]he federal registration of a trademark does not create an exclusive property right in the mark."

  2. In re Cordua Rests., Inc.

    823 F.3d 594 (Fed. Cir. 2016)   Cited 30 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain words referring to key aspects of a genus of services were generic for those services

  3. In re Nett Designs, Inc.

    236 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2001)   Cited 28 times
    Finding that prior registrations of marks including the term ULTIMATE "do not conclusively rebut the Board's finding that ULTIMATE is descriptive in the context of this mark"

  4. Bros. of the Wheel M.C. Exec. Council, Inc. v. Mollohan

    909 F. Supp. 2d 506 (S.D.W. Va. 2012)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that “defendant's internet activity is a use in commerce”

  5. In re City of Hous.

    731 F.3d 1326 (Fed. Cir. 2013)   Cited 3 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding USPTO's refusal to register the Seal of the City of Houston, Texas

  6. West Florida Seafood, Inc. v. Jet Restaurants

    31 F.3d 1122 (Fed. Cir. 1994)   Cited 21 times
    Recognizing that separate corporate, business and personal entities that operate as a single entity in the eyes of the consuming public may be treated as such for trademark purposes

  7. In re Omega

    494 F.3d 1362 (Fed. Cir. 2007)   Cited 1 times
    Holding that “[i]t is within the discretion of the PTO to require that one's goods be identified with particularity” in a trademark application

  8. Application of Data Packaging Corp.

    453 F.2d 1300 (C.C.P.A. 1972)   Cited 8 times

    Patent Appeal No. 8592. January 27, 1972. Stanley Sacks, Boston, Mass. (Wolf, Greenfield Sacks), Boston, Mass., attorneys of record, for appellant. S. Wm. Cochran, Washington, D.C., for Commissioner of Patents; Raymond E. Martin, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, ALMOND, BALDWIN, and LANE, Judges. RICH, Judge. This ex parte appeal is from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, one member dissenting

  9. Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification

    15 U.S.C. § 1051   Cited 3,920 times   127 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark

  10. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,612 times   274 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"

  11. Section 7 - Position and manner of display

    4 U.S.C. § 7   Cited 5 times

    The flag, when carried in a procession with another flag or flags, should be either on the marching right; that is, the flag's own right, or, if there is a line of other flags, in front of the center of that line. (a) The flag should not be displayed on a float in a parade except from a staff, or as provided in subsection (i) of this section. (b) The flag should not be draped over the hood, top, sides, or back of a vehicle or of a railroad train or a boat. When the flag is displayed on a motorcar