Alabama Roofing & Metal Co., Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,707 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
  2. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.

    94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 179 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Bowman Transportation, Inc.

    314 F.2d 497 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 12 times

    No. 19552. March 1, 1963. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, P.M. Giesey, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for appellant. William M. Pate, Atlanta, Ga., for appellee. Before JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges and GROOMS, District Judge. PER CURIAM. The evidence in this case as presented to us is sufficient to warrant the conclusion of the Board that employee Mann was discharged for asserting a grievance