No. 13359. February 13, 1951. Fannie M. Boyls, Attorney, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl., N.L.R.B. and A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl., N.L.R.B., all of Washingston, D.C., for petitioner. W.M. Fulcher, Augusta, Ga., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and BORAH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. In this case the labor union involved in the controversy at the plant had not complied with Sec. 9(f), (g), and (h) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U
No. 13756. April 15, 1952. Norton J. Come, Attorney, N.L.R.B., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl. N.L.R.B., and David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl. N.L.R.B., all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Cubbedge Snow, Macon, Ga., Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and STRUM, Circuit Judges. BORAH, Circuit Judge. This is a conventional proceeding under Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e), in which the National Labor
No. 11877. Argued June 7, 1956. Decided June 18, 1956. Fred U. Reel, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Marcel-Mallet Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Sherman T. Rock, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Paul, Lawrence Rock, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for respondents. Before GOODRICH, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is a petition for enforcement