AK Tube, LLC
3 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.
420 U.S. 251 (1975) Cited 434 times 64 Legal AnalysesHolding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness
N.L.R.B. v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.
936 F.2d 144 (3d Cir. 1991) Cited 17 timesNos. 90-3857, 91-3060. Submitted Under Third Circuit Rule 12(6) June 7, 1991. Decided June 25, 1991. As Amended June 28, 1991. James F. Brady, New Jersey Bell Telephone Co., Newark, N.J., for respondent. Howard E. Perlstein, Richard A. Cohen, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Ellen Dichner, Gladstein, Reif Meginniss, New York City, for intervenor. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before SLOVITER, Chief Judge, and GREENBERG and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE
Lennox Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
637 F.2d 340 (5th Cir. 1981) Cited 6 timesIn Lennox, we held that an employee had sufficiently invoked his Weingarten right when the supervisor to whom the request was made was present at the interview, even though the company official who conducted the interview was unaware of the request and the supervisor to whom the request was made did not know what the full scope of the interview would be.