§

Aircraft Plating Co., Inc.

213 N.L.R.B. 664 (N.L.R.B. 1974)
Aircraft Plating Co., Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. Amalgamated Clothing Wkrs. of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    365 F.2d 898 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 63 times

    Nos. 19452, 19515. Argued January 10, 1966. Decided June 27, 1966. Mr. Joel Field, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Jacob Sheinkman, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19452. Mr. Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19515

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Long Island Airport Limousine Serv

    468 F.2d 292 (2d Cir. 1972)   Cited 26 times
    Affirming NLRB finding of Section 8 violation where discharged employee, who was “union ‘spearhead’ for organizing the [c]ompany's drivers,” had been soliciting union support on day before abrupt discharge, and employer's asserted reasons that employee had poor employment record, had received traffic tickets, and submitted incomplete paperwork—including “a particularly serious incident ... that involved missing cash collections” for which he was warned—were contradictory and pretextual, and where treatment of other employees for similar misconduct was disparate

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Fullerton Publishing Company

    283 F.2d 545 (9th Cir. 1960)   Cited 30 times

    No. 16821. October 28, 1960. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Melvin Pollack, James A. Ryan, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. O'Melveny Myers, Roy E. Potts and Marshall A. Rutter, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before STEPHENS, BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges. JERTBERG, Circuit Judge. Before us is a petition to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board. The order

  5. N.L.R.B. v. International Van Lines

    448 F.2d 905 (9th Cir. 1971)   Cited 6 times

    No. 25698. September 3, 1971. Abigail Baskir, Washington, D.C. (argued), Stanley R. Zirkin, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Abraham Siegel, Director, NLRB, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Norman Kirshman (argued), of Goldstein, Gentile Kirshman, Beverly Hills, Cal., W. Thomas Arruda, Oakland, Cal., Brundage Hackler, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before BARNES, DUNIWAY and TRASK, Circuit Judges

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys