§
Airborne Express

13 Cited authorities

  1. Permian Basin Area Rate Cases

    390 U.S. 747 (1968)   Cited 682 times
    Holding that agreements may be abrogated in circumstances of "unequivocal public necessity"

  2. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  4. Boire v. Greyhound Corp.

    376 U.S. 473 (1964)   Cited 426 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding status of employer as independent contractor is immaterial because focus of joint employment inquiry is on employees, not employers

  5. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.

    691 F.2d 1117 (3d Cir. 1982)   Cited 339 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that joint employer situation exists only when "two or more employers exert significant control over the same employees . . . [where] they share or co-determine those matters governing essential terms and conditions of employment"

  8. American Trucking v. A., T. S. F. R. Co.

    387 U.S. 397 (1967)   Cited 164 times
    Declaring that an agency, “in light of reconsideration of the relevant facts and its mandate, may alter its past interpretation and overturn past administrative rulings”

  9. Central Transport Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    997 F.2d 1180 (7th Cir. 1993)   Cited 22 times
    In Central Transport the court rejected the Board's finding that Central had a joint employer duty to bargain with employees it leased from Big John Inc. because the union's representation petition and the Board's representation certification named only Big John Inc. as the employer.

  10. Tex. World Serv. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    928 F.2d 1426 (5th Cir. 1991)   Cited 18 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 89-4892. 90-4047. April 18, 1991. James S. Horwitz, Houston, Tex., for Texas World Service Co., Inc. Patrick W. Jordan, Keck, Mahin Cate, San Francisco, Cal., for Song Ae Lim. Robert F. Mace, Linda J. Dreeben, and Aileen Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Robert H. Miller, Regional Director, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for other interested parties. On petition for review and cross-application for enforcement of an order of the national labor