Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,036 times 67 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Hedstrom Co. v. N.L.R.B
629 F.2d 305 (3d Cir. 1980) Cited 43 times
Affirming the Board's finding that a supervisor's statement was coercive, despite employee testimony suggesting otherwise, because the record supported both interpretations
Sturgis Newport Bus. Forms, v. N.L.R.B
563 F.2d 1252 (5th Cir. 1977) Cited 31 times
Finding that an employee's evasive answers to questions raises the inference that they feared reprisal
N.L.R.B. v. Appletree Chevrolet, Inc.
608 F.2d 988 (4th Cir. 1979) Cited 28 times
In Appletree Chevrolet, the Board's petition for enforcement was not allowed when review of its proceedings made plain that the Board did little more than cite Gissel as the basis for its bargaining order.
International Un., United A., A. v. N.L.R.B
363 F.2d 702 (D.C. Cir. 1966) Cited 34 times
Rejecting argument NLRB used section 8(c) protected statements as "as some evidence of the unfair labor practices themselves" and concluding statements were used only to "place . . . other acts in context"
N.L.R.B. v. Apple Tree Chevrolet, Inc.
671 F.2d 838 (4th Cir. 1982) Cited 12 times
Declining to enforce a Gissel order in light of a 75% employee turnover
Struthers-Dunn, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
574 F.2d 796 (3d Cir. 1978) Cited 7 times
Denying enforcement of the Board's bargaining order when union card majority had dissipated before commission of employer's unfair labor practices because of "important goal of effectively ascertaining free choice"
N.L.R.B. v. Georgia Rug Mill
308 F.2d 89 (5th Cir. 1962) Cited 22 times
No. 19223. September 18, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before BROWN, WISDOM and BELL, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order that the respondent, Georgia Rug Mill, cease violating Section 8(a)(1) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §
N.L.R.B. v. Quality Markets, Inc.
387 F.2d 20 (3d Cir. 1967) Cited 12 times
No. 16579. Argued October 6, 1967. Decided December 18, 1967. Robert Giannasi, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Raymond A. Anderson, Johnson, Peterson, Tener Anderson, Jamestown, N.Y., for respondent. Before STALEY, Chief Judge, and MARIS and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT STALEY

Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Affirming the Board's finding that a supervisor's statement was coercive, despite employee testimony suggesting otherwise, because the record supported both interpretations

Finding that an employee's evasive answers to questions raises the inference that they feared reprisal

In Appletree Chevrolet, the Board's petition for enforcement was not allowed when review of its proceedings made plain that the Board did little more than cite Gissel as the basis for its bargaining order.

Rejecting argument NLRB used section 8(c) protected statements as "as some evidence of the unfair labor practices themselves" and concluding statements were used only to "place . . . other acts in context"

Declining to enforce a Gissel order in light of a 75% employee turnover

Denying enforcement of the Board's bargaining order when union card majority had dissipated before commission of employer's unfair labor practices because of "important goal of effectively ascertaining free choice"