Air Line Pilots Assn.

23 Cited authorities

Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
535 U.S. 137 (2002) Cited 322 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that backpay awards to undocumented workers terminated in violation of the National Labor Relations Act ran counter to federal immigration law
Railroad Trainmen v. Terminal Co.
394 U.S. 369 (1969) Cited 370 times
Holding that state court could not issue injunction against peaceful strike sought by third-party railroad terminal operator to avoid economic damages from shutdown of terminal
National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
386 U.S. 612 (1967) Cited 392 times
Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"
Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council
341 U.S. 675 (1951) Cited 494 times 1 Legal Analyses
Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
Burlington No. R. Co. v. Maintenance Employes
481 U.S. 429 (1987) Cited 158 times
Holding that Norris-LaGuardia prevents injunctions against union picketing of terminals through which employer's trains ran
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Enterprise Ass'n of Steam, Hot Water, Hydraulic Sprinkler, Pneumatic Tube, Ice Machine & General Pipefitters
429 U.S. 507 (1977) Cited 139 times
Stating that if a union were to attempt to capture work it had previously acquiesced to non-union workers' performing, such conduct would serve "not to preserve, but to aggrandize, its own position and that of its members," concluding that "[s]uch activity is squarely within the statute" and thus prohibited
Allen Bradley Co. v. Union
325 U.S. 797 (1945) Cited 304 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the defendants were not protected by the statutory labor exemption because the union had combined with contractors and manufacturers in order to boycott the plaintiffs' business
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n
447 U.S. 490 (1980) Cited 65 times 4 Legal Analyses
In NLRB v. Longshoremen, 447 U.S. 490 (1980) (ILA I), we reviewed the National Labor Relations Board's conclusion that the Rules and their enforcement constituted unlawful secondary activity under §§ 8(b)(4)(B) and 8(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(4) (B) and 158(e).
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n
473 U.S. 61 (1985) Cited 53 times
Explaining that collective bargaining agreement cannot seek "to achieve union objectives outside the primary employer-employee relationship"
Steelworkers v. Labor Board
376 U.S. 492 (1964) Cited 75 times
Stating that section 8(b) prohibits labor unions from engaging in "secondary boycotting" by "exert[ing] pressure on an employer not involved in the relevant labor dispute ('the secondary employer') in order to obtain a favorable result in the ongoing labor dispute with another employer ('the primary employer')"
Section 152 - Definitions
29 U.S.C. § 152 Cited 3,214 times 27 Legal Analyses
Defining a supervisor to include “any individual having authority . . . to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment”
Section 151 - Definitions; short title
45 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 2,968 times 7 Legal Analyses
Defining "minor dispute" as disputes "growing out of grievances or out of the interpretation or application of agreements covering rates of pay, rules, or working conditions."
Section 181 - Application of subchapter I to carriers by air
45 U.S.C. § 181 Cited 466 times 5 Legal Analyses
Amending RLA to apply to interstate air carriers

Air Line Pilots Assn.

23 Cited authorities

Holding that backpay awards to undocumented workers terminated in violation of the National Labor Relations Act ran counter to federal immigration law

Holding that state court could not issue injunction against peaceful strike sought by third-party railroad terminal operator to avoid economic damages from shutdown of terminal

Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"

Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

Holding that Norris-LaGuardia prevents injunctions against union picketing of terminals through which employer's trains ran

Holding that the defendants were not protected by the statutory labor exemption because the union had combined with contractors and manufacturers in order to boycott the plaintiffs' business

Explaining that collective bargaining agreement cannot seek "to achieve union objectives outside the primary employer-employee relationship"

Defining "minor dispute" as disputes "growing out of grievances or out of the interpretation or application of agreements covering rates of pay, rules, or working conditions."

Amending RLA to apply to interstate air carriers