§

Agustin Casarez, Complainant, v. Paul H. O'Neill, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.

01A10673 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 1, 2001)
Agustin Casarez, Complainant, v. Paul H. O'Neill, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.

2 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 243,214 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is appropriate when the evidence is "so one-sided that one party must prevail as a matter of law"

  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 222,322 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"