§

Agricom Oilseeds, Inc.

245 N.L.R.B. 616 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
Agricom Oilseeds, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  3. Linden Lumber Division, Summer & Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    419 U.S. 301 (1974)   Cited 55 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "that while the election process has acknowledged superiority in ascertaining whether a union has majority support, [signed employee authorization] cards may adequately reflect employee sentiment"

  4. Food Store Emp. Un., L. No. 347 v. N.L.R.B

    433 F.2d 541 (D.C. Cir. 1970)   Cited 7 times

    Nos. 22318, 22414. Argued December 15, 1969. Decided May 4, 1970. Miss Judith A. Lonnquist, Chicago, Ill., with whom Messrs. Mozart G. Ratner and Albert Gore, Chicago, Ill., were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 22,318 and intervenor in No. 22,414. Mr. Baruch A. Fellner, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, for petitioner in No. 22,414 and respondent in No. 22,318. Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost

  5. Matthew v. Coppin

    32 F.2d 100 (9th Cir. 1929)   Cited 14 times
    Ordering a new trial on remand from Supreme Court but on direct appeal because jury had not been instructed in conformity with United States v. Staples