Agri Laboratories, Ltd.
4 Cited authorities
Magic Wand, Inc. v. RDB, Inc.
940 F.2d 638 (Fed. Cir. 1991) Cited 32 times 1 Legal AnalysesExplaining that the Lanham Act is clear "that the relevant public for a genericness determination is the purchasing or consuming public"
American Cyanamid v. Connaught Laboratories
800 F.2d 306 (2d Cir. 1986) Cited 32 timesFinding no likelihood of confusion between "HibVAX" and "HiblMMUNE" in part because the term "Hib" signified that the respective vaccines at issue were designed to treat Haemophilus influenza type b
Canadian Imperial Bank v. Wells Fargo Bank
811 F.2d 1490 (Fed. Cir. 1987) Cited 13 timesAffirming likelihood of confusion
In re Hyper Shoppes (Ohio), Inc.
837 F.2d 463 (Fed. Cir. 1988) Cited 11 times 1 Legal AnalysesFinding similarity between furniture and "general merchandise store services," and rejecting the distinction between goods and services as having "little or no legal significance"