§
Agency.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Gen. Tel. Co. of Sw. v. Falcon

    457 U.S. 147 (1982)   Cited 5,846 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that named plaintiff must prove “much more than the validity of his own claim”; the individual plaintiff must show that “the individual's claim and the class claims will share common questions of law or fact and that the individual's claim will be typical of the class claims,” explicitly referencing the “commonality” and “typicality” requirements of Rule 23

  2. Holsey v. Armour Co.

    743 F.2d 199 (4th Cir. 1984)   Cited 170 times
    Holding that employer's intent may be inferred through circumstantial evidence

  3. Richardson v. Byrd

    709 F.2d 1016 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 142 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming the district court's class certification and definition that included future members and determining that the class representative had a sufficient nexus to enable her to represent a class consisting of past, present, and future employees and applicants pursuant to Rule 23 and (b)

  4. Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16   Cited 5,082 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"