§

Advanced Stretchforming International

336 N.L.R.B. 1153 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Advanced Stretchforming International

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 480 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  2. Kallmann v. N.L.R.B

    640 F.2d 1094 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 64 times
    Holding that an employer could not be compelled to pay a greater amount of back-pay than the amount the employer would have paid its employees in the absence of the unfair labor practice

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Advanced Stretchforming Intern

    233 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 20 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board is entitled to summary enforcement of unchallenged rulings

  4. Armco, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    832 F.2d 357 (6th Cir. 1987)   Cited 18 times
    In Armco, the Sixth Circuit held that the § 10(b) period did not commence when the employer communicated its intent to recognize another union, but only when the other union actually signed an agreement with the employer, thereby consummating the labor practices violation.

  5. National Lab. Relations v. Adv. Stretchforming

    208 F.3d 801 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 3 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 97-71047 Argued and Submitted April 13, 1999 — Pasadena, California Filed April 4, 2000 COUNSEL Sharon I. Block, National Labor Relations Board, for the petitioner. Henry M. Willis, Schwartz, Steinsapir, Dohrmann Sommers, for the petitioner-intervenor. Larry Walraven, O'Melveny Myers, for the respondent. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board NLRB No. 21-CA-29104. Before: ROBERT BOOCHEVER, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN and A. WALLACE TASHIMA, Circuit Judges