Advanced Life Systems, Inc.
15 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 711 times 29 Legal AnalysesHolding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.
356 U.S. 342 (1958) Cited 296 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."
Canning v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
705 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 2013) Cited 96 times 37 Legal AnalysesHolding that such a challenge qualifies as an "extraordinary circumstance"
Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board
170 F.2d 247 (7th Cir. 1949) Cited 156 times 2 Legal AnalysesAccepting the Board's conclusion "that the term `wages' . . . must be construed to include emoluments of value, like pension and insurance benefits, which may accrue to employees out of their employment relationship"
Cadbury Beverages v. N.L.R.B
160 F.3d 24 (D.C. Cir. 1998) Cited 20 timesHolding that it was “not incumbent on the general counsel to prove, nor on the Board to find, that the company's asserted nondiscriminatory reason of insubordination was pretextual ... although such a showing would have served as a conclusive rejection of [the company's] affirmative defense”
Daily News of Los Angeles v. N.L.R.B
73 F.3d 406 (D.C. Cir. 1996) Cited 15 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that merit-increase program is a mandatory subject of bargaining
More Truck Lines, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
324 F.3d 735 (D.C. Cir. 2003) Cited 2 timesNo. 01-1493. Argued March 10, 2003. Decided April 11, 2003. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Lawrence J. Gartner argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Betty Southard Murphy and Johnine P. Barnes. David A. Seid, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong
Phelps Dodge Min. Co., Tyrone Br. v. N.L.R.B
22 F.3d 1493 (10th Cir. 1994) Cited 6 timesHolding that "appreciation" bonuses, one of which was given to all employees in an amount equal to eighty hours of work at each employee's standard pay rate, were not subject to mandatory bargaining
Acme Die Casting v. N.L.R.B
93 F.3d 854 (D.C. Cir. 1996) Cited 4 timesFinding that discretion over timing or amount will exclude past raises from the existing terms and conditions of employment
N.L.R.B. v. Wonder State Manufacturing Company
344 F.2d 210 (8th Cir. 1965) Cited 28 timesFinding award of one week's pay to be a gift and not subject to mandatory bargaining
Section 158 - Unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 158 Cited 10,325 times 84 Legal AnalysesGranting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,095 times 34 Legal AnalysesFinding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"
Section 157 - Right of employees as to organization, collective bargaining, etc.
29 U.S.C. § 157 Cited 3,309 times 97 Legal AnalysesGranting employees the right to engage in or refrain from engaging in union activity