Advanced Armament Corp., LLC
6 Cited authorities
J J Snack Foods Corp. v. McDonalds' Corp.
932 F.2d 1460 (Fed. Cir. 1991) Cited 44 times 1 Legal AnalysesRuling that McDonald's has established a family of marks in product names starting with the prefix "Me"
In re Fox
702 F.3d 633 (Fed. Cir. 2012) Cited 7 times 2 Legal AnalysesAffirming refusal to register COCK SUCKER mark for lollipops
In re Mavety Media Group Ltd.
33 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 1994) Cited 13 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that PTO failed to prove that term was scandalous and thus unregistrable; PTO relied on dictionary definition of disputed term, but dictionary provided alternative definitions; proof failed because of "the absence of evidence as to which of these definitions the substantial composite [of consumers] would choose"
Application of Standard Elektrik
371 F.2d 870 (C.C.P.A. 1967) Cited 6 timesPatent Appeal No. 7709. February 9, 1967. C. Cornell Remsen, Jr., New York City (Donald J. Goodell, New York City, of counsel), for appellant. Joseph Schimmel, Washington, D.C. (George C. Roeming, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, SMITH, and ALMOND, Judges, and Judge WILLIAM H. KIRKPATRICK. Senior District Judge, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. SMITH, Judge. Appellant appeals from the decision of the Trademark
In re Riverbank Canning Co.
95 F.2d 327 (C.C.P.A. 1938) Cited 11 times 3 Legal AnalysesAffirming refusal to register MADONNA mark for wine
Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration
15 U.S.C. § 1052 Cited 1,585 times 272 Legal AnalysesGranting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"