§

Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc.

265 N.L.R.B. 134 (N.L.R.B. 1982)
Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 711 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 270 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  3. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  4. Hinson v. N.L.R.B

    428 F.2d 133 (8th Cir. 1970)   Cited 81 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Section 302 "does not comprehend solely a collective bargaining agreement to the exclusion of any other possible written agreement"

  5. J.P. Stevens Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    623 F.2d 322 (4th Cir. 1980)   Cited 12 times
    Determining that the Board had not sufficiently explained itself where it was “difficult to ascertain ... why the Board apparently departed from its precedents”

  6. Dist. 65, Distrib. Wkrs. of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    593 F.2d 1155 (D.C. Cir. 1978)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 77-1239, 77-1367. Argued May 4, 1978. Decided September 26, 1978. Andrew Tranovich, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., a member of the bar of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court with whom John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for the National Labor Relations Board, petitioner in No. 77-1367 and respondent in No. 77-1239. Lewis M. Steel, New York City, with whom Eugene G. Eisner