§
Adco Electric

13 Cited authorities

  1. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  2. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Security Guard Service, Inc.

    384 F.2d 143 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 53 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "the standard reluctance to apply [a statutory] exception broadly"

  4. Delco-Remy Div., Gen. Motors Corp v. N.L.R.B

    596 F.2d 1295 (5th Cir. 1979)   Cited 25 times
    In Delco-Remy we denied enforcement of an order ostensibly based on coercive interrogation, soliciting aid against the union, and threatening discharge.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Chicago Metallic Corp.

    794 F.2d 527 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 14 times
    In Chicago Metallic, unlike the situation presented here, the employee at issue was assigned no manual chores and had the authority and discretion to take disciplinary action against employees.

  6. Monotech of Mississippi v. N.L.R.B

    876 F.2d 514 (5th Cir. 1989)   Cited 9 times
    Finding a supervisor excluded from the bargaining unit based on only two supervisory factors, one of which is authority to grant partial days off

  7. N.L.R.B. v. McEver Engineering, Inc.

    784 F.2d 634 (5th Cir. 1986)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that "[b]efore an employer can be said to have discriminated against its employees for their protected activity, the Board must show that the supervisor responsible for the alleged discriminatory action knew about the" union activity

  8. Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    424 F.2d 1151 (7th Cir. 1970)   Cited 20 times
    In Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. NLRB, 424 F.2d 1151 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 831, 91 S.Ct. 63, 27 L.Ed.2d 62 (1970), the Seventh Circuit permitted the Board to use a 50% formula to determine whether certain workers could vote in a union election.

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. S. Bleachery

    257 F.2d 235 (4th Cir. 1958)   Cited 33 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the essential inquiry is whether the employer shares the power of management

  10. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    655 F.2d 932 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 7 times

    No. 79-7541. Argued and Submitted October 9, 1980. Decided March 12, 1981. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc November 12, 1981. James Adler, Munger, Tolles Rickershauser, Los Angeles, Cal., argued, for appellant. Elliott Moore, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief; Gary Green, Director, Legal Dept., Washington, D.C., for appellee. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges and PFAELZER, District Judge. The Honorable Mariana

  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,339 times   88 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

  12. Section 152 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 152   Cited 3,219 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Defining a supervisor to include “any individual having authority . . . to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment”

  13. Section 102.48 - No exceptions filed; exceptions filed; motions for reconsideration, rehearing, or reopening the record

    29 C.F.R. § 102.48   Cited 108 times
    Limiting reopening of the record to "newly discovered evidence" that "would require a different result"