ADB Utility Contractors, Inc.

21 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,035 times 67 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Sure-Tan, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
467 U.S. 883 (1984) Cited 416 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that NLRB could order reinstatement with back pay as a remedy for constructive discharge
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Yeshiva University
444 U.S. 672 (1980) Cited 183 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that all faculty members are managers for purposes of federal labor law even though they lack any legal instruments of control
Hickerson v. City of New York
525 U.S. 1067 (1999) Cited 89 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that jurisdiction to grant a divorce may exist without jurisdiction to adjudicate the parties' property rights
N.L.R.B. v. McCullough Environmental Serv
5 F.3d 923 (5th Cir. 1993) Cited 98 times
Concluding that statement that "things were going to get a lot tougher around here" upon unionization constituted a threat
Lee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
117 F.3d 1454 (D.C. Cir. 1997) Cited 27 times 3 Legal Analyses
Noting that, "[b]ecause affirmative bargaining orders interfere with the employee free choice that is a core principle of the Act," we "view them with suspicion" and demand special justification for them
Automotive Council v. N.L.R.B
483 F.3d 628 (9th Cir. 2007) Cited 13 times
Concluding that substantial evidence supported the NLRB's finding that labor organization "did not have actual or constructive knowledge" of unfair labor practices
Power Inc. v. N.L.R.B
40 F.3d 409 (D.C. Cir. 1994) Cited 26 times
Holding that coincident timing and uncontested § 8 violations was sufficient evidence to support Board's finding
Douglas Foods Corp. v. N.L.R.B
251 F.3d 1056 (D.C. Cir. 2001) Cited 15 times
Vacating restoration order where Board gave no "explanation of its authority to enter such order or [the company's] ability to carry it out," and where order seemed to require "forced repurchase of independently owned assets"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hilliard Devel
187 F.3d 133 (1st Cir. 1999) Cited 15 times
Finding evidence insufficient to show that nurses played a supervisory role where they only reported to others who made the actual disciplinary decisions
Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 160 Cited 7,061 times 23 Legal Analyses
Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB
Section 404.985 - Application of circuit court law
20 C.F.R. § 404.985 Cited 56 times
Stating that the SSA will issue an Acquiescence Ruling when it "determine that a United States Court of Appeals holding conflicts with [the SSA's] interpretation of a provision of the Social Security Act or regulations"

ADB Utility Contractors, Inc.

21 Cited authorities

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Holding that NLRB could order reinstatement with back pay as a remedy for constructive discharge

Holding that all faculty members are managers for purposes of federal labor law even though they lack any legal instruments of control

Holding that jurisdiction to grant a divorce may exist without jurisdiction to adjudicate the parties' property rights

Concluding that statement that "things were going to get a lot tougher around here" upon unionization constituted a threat

Noting that, "[b]ecause affirmative bargaining orders interfere with the employee free choice that is a core principle of the Act," we "view them with suspicion" and demand special justification for them

Concluding that substantial evidence supported the NLRB's finding that labor organization "did not have actual or constructive knowledge" of unfair labor practices

Holding that coincident timing and uncontested § 8 violations was sufficient evidence to support Board's finding

Vacating restoration order where Board gave no "explanation of its authority to enter such order or [the company's] ability to carry it out," and where order seemed to require "forced repurchase of independently owned assets"

Finding evidence insufficient to show that nurses played a supervisory role where they only reported to others who made the actual disciplinary decisions

Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB

Stating that the SSA will issue an Acquiescence Ruling when it "determine that a United States Court of Appeals holding conflicts with [the SSA's] interpretation of a provision of the Social Security Act or regulations"