§

Adalberto S.,1 Complainant, v. Dr. Mark T. Esper, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

0120170392 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 12, 2018)
Adalberto S.,1 Complainant, v. Dr. Mark T. Esper, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc.

    530 U.S. 133 (2000)   Cited 21,187 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, since the 58-year-old plaintiff was fired by his 60-year-old employer, there was an inference that "age discrimination was not the motive"

  2. St. Mary's Honor Ctr. v. Hicks

    509 U.S. 502 (1993)   Cited 12,283 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a trier of fact may infer discrimination upon rejecting an employer's proffered reason for termination

  3. Tex. Dept. of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine

    450 U.S. 248 (1981)   Cited 19,997 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding in the Title VII context that the plaintiff's prima facie case creates "a legally mandatory, rebuttable presumption" that shifts the burden of proof to the employer, and "if the employer is silent in the face of the presumption, the court must enter judgment for the plaintiff"

  4. Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters

    438 U.S. 567 (1978)   Cited 2,164 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court was "entitled to consider the racial mix of the work force when trying to make the determination as to motivation" in the employment discrimination context

  5. Widmar v. Sun Chem. Corp.

    772 F.3d 457 (7th Cir. 2014)   Cited 194 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "speculat[ion] as to the employer's state of mind" is not sufficient to defeat summary judgment