§

Action Auto Stores, Inc.

298 N.L.R.B. 875 (N.L.R.B. 1990)
Action Auto Stores, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Action Automotive, Inc.

    469 U.S. 490 (1985)   Cited 44 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board rule excluding from bargaining unit employees who are relatives of management

  4. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  5. Indiana Cal-Pro, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    863 F.2d 1292 (6th Cir. 1988)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that the NLRB possessed substantial evidence supporting the conclusion that a supervisor violated § 158 when he told employees that he heard from ownership that unionization would lead to the owners shutting down the plant

  6. Automated Business Systems v. N.L.R.B

    497 F.2d 262 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 29 times
    Holding a bargaining order is appropriate where at one point the union had a majority but employer misconduct undermined majority strength and impeded the election process

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Action Automotive, Inc.

    853 F.2d 433 (6th Cir. 1988)   Cited 1 times
    In NLRB v. Action Automotive, Inc., 853 F.2d 433, 434 (6th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1041, 109 S.Ct. 865, 102 L.Ed.2d 989 (1989), this court held that "a high turnover of employees unaccompanied by objective evidence that new employees do not support the union is no evidence of loss of majority status by the union."

  8. Action Automotive, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    717 F.2d 1033 (6th Cir. 1983)   Cited 3 times

    Nos. 82-1498, 82-1644. Argued August 23, 1983. Decided September 30, 1983. Stewart J. Katz (argued), Keller, Thoma, Schwarze, Schwarze, DuBay Katz, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Patrick Szymanski (argued) Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before LIVELY and JONES, Circuit Judges, and RUBIN, Chief Judge. The Honorable Carl B. Rubin, United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM. This case

  9. Rule 901 - Authenticating or Identifying Evidence

    Fed. R. Evid. 901   Cited 5,325 times   53 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]estimony that a matter is what it is claimed to be" is sufficient authentication

  10. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,874 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions