§
ACS, LLC

12 Cited authorities

  1. AT&T Techs., Inc. v. Commc'ns Workers of Am.

    475 U.S. 643 (1986)   Cited 5,497 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it was for the court to decide whether a particular labor dispute fell within the arbitration clause of a collective-bargaining agreement

  2. Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.

    363 U.S. 574 (1960)   Cited 5,612 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”

  3. Litton Financial Printing Division v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    501 U.S. 190 (1991)   Cited 795 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a court must determine the validity of an arbitration agreement, it "cannot avoid that duty" just because the court must decide an issue on the merits

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  5. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  6. Phoenix Newspapers v. Phoenix Mailers Lo. 752

    989 F.2d 1077 (9th Cir. 1993)   Cited 56 times
    Vacating arbitrator's award when employer rejected same remedy in prior collective bargaining agreement negotiations

  7. Local No. 70 v. Interstate Distributor Co.

    832 F.2d 507 (9th Cir. 1987)   Cited 52 times
    Finding dispute over termination of agreement not one of arbitrability

  8. United Broth. of Carpenters v. Desert Palace

    94 F.3d 1308 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 30 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Opining that the Supreme Court's observation in First Options that "there is no strong federal policy favoring arbitration of commercial disputes, does not apply in the collective bargaining context"

  9. Exxon Chemical Co. v. N.L.R.B

    386 F.3d 1160 (D.C. Cir. 2004)   Cited 11 times

    Nos. 03-1343 and 03-1413. Argued September 16, 2004. Decided October 26, 2004. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Tony P. Rosenstein argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Kathryn S. Vaughn and Joe Robert Caldwell, Jr. Richard A. Cohen, Senior Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson,

  10. Desert Coca Cola v. Gen. Sales Drivers

    335 F.2d 198 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 14 times

    No. 19128. July 23, 1964. Morton Galane, Las Vegas, Nev., for appellants. George Rudiak, Las Vegas, Nev., for appellee. Before BARNES, Circuit Judge, MADDEN, Judge of the Court of Claims, and BROWNING, Circuit Judge. BARNES, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. The appellants, a group of employers comprising the soft drink bottling industry in their area, brought a suit for a declaratory judgment against the appellee, a labor