§

Acme Wire Works, Inc.

229 N.L.R.B. 333 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
Acme Wire Works, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  2. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  3. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Beck Engraving Co.

    522 F.2d 475 (3d Cir. 1975)   Cited 21 times
    Reversing the Board's conclusion that there was no impasse

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Hi-Way Billboards, Inc.

    500 F.2d 181 (5th Cir. 1974)   Cited 20 times
    Reversing Board's finding that impasse is akin to hiatus in negotiations.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Tulsa Sheet Metal Works, Inc.

    367 F.2d 55 (10th Cir. 1966)   Cited 29 times
    Holding that where an agreement contains a “savings and severability” clause, the agreement “should not be completely obliterated because some provisions are beyond the legal limits ... unless such illegal provisions permeate the complete contract to such an extent as to affects its enforceability entirely”

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Central Plumbing Company

    492 F.2d 1252 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 16 times

    No. 73-1437. March 21, 1974. Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William F. Wachter, Jane P. Schlaifer, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Robert J. Brown, and Dean E. Denlinger, Smith Schnacke, Dayton, Ohio, on brief, for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and EDWARDS and MILLER, Circuit

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Crimptex, Inc.

    517 F.2d 501 (1st Cir. 1975)   Cited 9 times
    In NLRB v. Crimptex, Inc., 517 F.2d 501, 504 n. 5 (1st Cir. 1975) we stated in dictum that strikes in protest of supervisory changes were not as a rule protected.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Palomar Corporation

    465 F.2d 731 (5th Cir. 1972)   Cited 9 times

    No. 72-1038. Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I. July 25, 1972. Rehearing Denied September 7, 1972. Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Charles N. Steele, Steven C. Kahn, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Clifford W. Potter, Director, Region 23, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., for petitioner. William A. Brown, Powell, Brown Maverick, Houston, Tex., for respondents

  10. Southwestern Pipe, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    444 F.2d 340 (5th Cir. 1971)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 28676, 28810. May 20, 1971. William A. Brown, Houston, Tex., Guy Farmer, Washington, D.C., Richard C. Keenan, New Orleans, La., Patterson, Belknap, Farmer, Shibley Wells, Washington, D.C., Kullman, Lang, Keenan, Inman Bee, New Orleans, La., Powell, Brown Maverick, Houston Tex., for Southwestern Pipe, Inc. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Nancy M. Sherman, Washington D.C., Clifford Potter, Director, N.L.R.B., Region 23, Houston, Tex., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick