Acme Die Casting
5 Cited authorities
Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board
379 U.S. 203 (1964) Cited 734 times 7 Legal AnalysesHolding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 712 times 29 Legal AnalysesHolding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Acme Die Casting v. N.L.R.B
26 F.3d 162 (D.C. Cir. 1994) Cited 8 timesIn Acme Die Casting v. N.L.R.B., 26 F.3d 162 (D.C. Cir. 1994) ("Acme I"), the court remanded the question of whether an employer committed unfair labor practices with respect to wage increases for formulation of a clearer standard for determining when granting or withholding wage increases constitutes a refusal to bargain.
N.L.R.B. v. Brown-Graves Lumber Co.
949 F.2d 194 (6th Cir. 1991) Cited 10 timesNo. 91-5080. Argued September 13, 1991. Decided November 13, 1991. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 13, 1992. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Collis Suzanne Stocking, Joseph J. Jablonski, Jr. (argued and briefed), N.L.R.B., Office of Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Frederick Calatrello, Director, N.L.R.B., Region 8, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner. Gary W. Spring (argued and briefed), George W. Rooney (briefed), Roetzel Andress, Akron, Ohio, for respondent. Appeal from
N.L.R.B. v. Acme Die Casting Corp.
728 F.2d 959 (7th Cir. 1984) Cited 4 timesDelineating similar factors