Acklin Stamping Company
4 Cited authorities
Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill
499 U.S. 65 (1991) Cited 1,076 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that this rule "applies to all union activity"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.
462 U.S. 393 (1983) Cited 652 times 11 Legal AnalysesHolding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal AnalysesHolding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 90, Operative Plasterers & Cement Masons' International Ass'n of the United States
606 F.2d 189 (7th Cir. 1979) Cited 7 timesNo. 78-2071. Argued May 30, 1979. Decided September 25, 1979. Frederick Havard, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Barry J. Levine, St. Louis, Mo., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before PELL, Circuit Judge, GEWIN, Senior Circuit Judge, and WOOD, Circuit Judge. Senior Circuit Judge Walter P. Gewin of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is sitting by designation. PELL, Circuit Judge. In this case the NLRB petitions for enforcement