§

Accurate Die Casting Co.

292 N.L.R.B. 982 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Accurate Die Casting Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bildisco & Bildisco

    465 U.S. 513 (1984)   Cited 1,161 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the failure of Congress to draft an exclusion for certain collective bargaining agreements in 11 U.S.C. § 365 indicates that the provision applies to all such agreements, in light of the previous use of such an exclusion by Congress in 11 U.S.C. § 1167

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  3. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 630 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  6. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Windham Community Memorial Hosp

    577 F.2d 805 (2d Cir. 1978)   Cited 26 times
    Approving Board presumption

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Pennco, Inc.

    684 F.2d 340 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 18 times

    No. 80-1654. March 16, 1982. Rehearing Denied April 8, 1982. Certiorari Denied November 8, 1982. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., David Fleischer, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gregory L. Monge, Van Antwerp, Hughes, Monge Jones, Ashland, Ky., for respondent. Before BROWN and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges and CHURCHILL, District Judge. The Honorable James P. Churchill, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. ORDER The Board petitions

  9. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,873 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions