§
AC Electric

11 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 497 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  4. Southport Pet., Co. v. N.L.R.B

    315 U.S. 100 (1942)   Cited 187 times
    Ruling that dissolution of company and transfer of assets did not prevent enforcement of a Board order

  5. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice

  6. Harter Tomato Products Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    133 F.3d 934 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 22 times

    No. 96-1326 Argued December 11, 1997 Decided January 23, 1998 Warren Davison argued the cause for petitioner/cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Mary E. Bruno. David A. Seid, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent/cross-petitioner. With him on the brief were Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Fred Cornnell, Supervisory Attorney. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.

    311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 71 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jarm Enterprises, Inc.

    785 F.2d 195 (7th Cir. 1986)   Cited 24 times
    Assessing business operations, plant, workforce, job positions, working conditions, supervisors, machinery, equipment, methods of production, and manufactured product or service to determine successor liability under NLRA

  9. N.L.R.B. v. St. Marys Foundry Co.

    860 F.2d 679 (6th Cir. 1988)   Cited 5 times

    No. 87-5922. Argued June 14, 1988. Decided November 3, 1988. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Steven Goldstein (argued), Barbara A. Atkin, Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Thomas M. Carolin, Lawrence R. Fisher, Seeley, Savidge and Aussen, Cleveland, Ohio, for St. Marys Foundry Co. Robert J. Brown (argued), Dayton, Ohio, for St. Marys Foundry, Inc. Leroy L. Hodge, Pittsburgh, Pa., for United Elec., Radio Machine Workers of America. Before MILBURN, GUY and NORRIS, Circuit

  10. United States Pipe and Foundry Co. v. N.L.R.B

    398 F.2d 544 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 23 times

    No. 24837. July 23, 1968. John J. Coleman, Jr., A. Henry Gaede, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for petitioner; Allen Poppleton, Bradley, Arant, Rose White, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel. Benj. L. Erdreich, Birmingham, Ala., Michael Gottesman, Washington, D.C., Bernard Kleinman, Chicago, Ill., Elliot Bredhoff, George H. Cohen, Washington, D.C., Jerome Cooper, Birmingham, Ala., for intervenor. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William F. Wachter, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel