§

ABC Concrete Co.

233 N.L.R.B. 1298 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
ABC Concrete Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 507 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  2. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  3. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

  4. N.L.R.B. v. A. Lasaponara Sons, Inc.

    541 F.2d 992 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 15 times
    Stating that a work stoppage was a protected strike because, unlike extreme cases of economic coercion like Marshall Car Wheel , "the economic pressure ... clearly failed to reach a degree so grossly disproportionate to the goal sought to be achieved that it renders the conduct unprotected"

  5. United Merchants Mfr., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    554 F.2d 1276 (4th Cir. 1977)   Cited 7 times

    No. 76-1465. Argued November 10, 1976. Decided May 9, 1977. Joe H. Clark, Atlanta, Ga. (David M. Vaughan, Elarbee, Clark Paul, Atlanta, Ga., on brief), for petitioner. Joseph P. Norelli, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Jay E. Shanklin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent. Petition for review from the National

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hijos De Ricardo Vela, Inc.

    475 F.2d 58 (1st Cir. 1973)   Cited 3 times

    No. 72-1084. Heard February 8, 1973. Decided March 5, 1973. John D. Burgoyne, Washington, D.C., with whom Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Judith Wilkenfeld, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Pedro E. Purcell Ruiz, Santurce, P. R., with whom George L. Weasler, Santurce, P. R., was on brief, for respondents. Before COFFIN, Chief Judge, and McENTEE and CAMPBELL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board (the "Board") has

  7. B. P. Motor Express Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    413 F.2d 1021 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 1 times

    No. 17045. July 24, 1969. George Gregory Mantho, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before KILEY and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges, and HOFFMAN, District Judge. Judge Hoffman is sitting by designation from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. JULIUS J. HOFFMAN, District Judge. The employer, B. P. Motor Express, Inc., has petitioned for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board, and the Board

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys