4 Cited authorities
N.L.R.B. v. Whitfield Pickle Company
374 F.2d 576 (5th Cir. 1967) Cited 29 timesNo. 22949. March 24, 1967. Rehearing Denied April 18, 1967. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frank H. Itkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Fred S. Ball, Montgomery, Ala., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges. GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board here petitions for enforcement of its order directed
N.L.R.B. v. Joseph Antell, Inc.
358 F.2d 880 (1st Cir. 1966) Cited 26 timesIn Antell, the court stated that the smallness of a plant, or a staff, may be material as bearing on the knowledge on the part of the employer of an employee's union activities, but only to the extent that it may be shown to have made it likely that the employer observed, or otherwise learned about the activity in question.
N.L.R.B. v. Pembeck Oil Corp.
404 F.2d 105 (2d Cir. 1968) Cited 16 timesIn Pembeck, decided after Better Val-U Stores, Judge Hays again dissented, pointing out that neither Flomatic nor Val-U Stores had reached to ยง 8(a)(5) cases and urging that the "flagrant violation" standard not be extended to such cases.
A.J. Krajewski Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B
413 F.2d 673 (1st Cir. 1969) Cited 11 timesNo. 7224. Heard April 8, 1969. Decided July 17, 1969. William J. Sheehan, Providence, R.I., for petitioner. Eugene B. Granof, Washington, D.C., Atty., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David C. Nevins, Atty., Washington, D.C. were on brief, for N.L.R.B., respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, McENTEE and COFFIN, Circuit Judges. McENTEE, Circuit Judge. On August 24, 1966, Michael Andreoli was called to the