§

Aargano Electric Corp.

248 N.L.R.B. 352 (N.L.R.B. 1980)
Aargano Electric Corp.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local Union No. 103, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers

    434 U.S. 335 (1978)   Cited 286 times
    Affirming a cease and desist order issued by the National Labor Relations Board to a striking, uncertified union, which the union alleged was inconsistent with a prior ruling of the agency

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 323 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  3. Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

    373 U.S. 221 (1963)   Cited 359 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

  4. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  5. Siegel Co. v. N. L. R. B

    398 U.S. 959 (1970)   Cited 134 times

    No. 1525. June 15, 1970. C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 417 F. 2d 1206.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Strong

    393 U.S. 357 (1969)   Cited 116 times
    Explaining that, though broad, the NLRA's grant of remedial power "does not authorize punitive measures"

  7. Hinson v. N.L.R.B

    428 F.2d 133 (8th Cir. 1970)   Cited 81 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Section 302 "does not comprehend solely a collective bargaining agreement to the exclusion of any other possible written agreement"

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Marcus Trucking Co.

    286 F.2d 583 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 65 times
    Treating application of undisputed legal standard to facts as “question of fact” subject to “substantial evidence” standard of § 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act

  9. Glomac Plastics, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    592 F.2d 94 (2d Cir. 1979)   Cited 23 times
    Upholding Board finding of bad faith where withdrawal of concessions aimed to prevent agreement

  10. Local No. 150, International Union of Operating Engineers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    480 F.2d 1186 (D.C. Cir. 1973)   Cited 29 times

    No. 71-1689. June 20, 1973. Bernard M. Baum, Daniel S. Shulman, Robert H. Baum, Chicago, Ill., and J. Albert Woll, Washington, D.C., were on the brief for petitioner. Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., at the time the brief was filed, Charles N. Steele, and Alan D. Cirker, Washington, D.C., Attys., N.L.R.B., were on the brief for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before McGOWAN, Circuit Judge, and WINTER