§

A W Cullum & Co., Inc.

182 N.L.R.B. 16 (N.L.R.B. 1970)
A W Cullum & Co., Inc.

18 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. H. K. Porter Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    397 U.S. 99 (1970)   Cited 222 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB is "without power to compel a company or a union to agree to any substantive contractual provision of a collective-bargaining agreement."

  3. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 118 times
    In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."

  5. A.H. BELO CORPORATION

    411 F.2d 959 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 28 times
    Deciding that the employer engaged in dilatory tactics in “causing negotiations to drag out over a year ... delay[ing] negotiations two months in order to reply to the union's original proposal, and when it did, counter[ing] with a sketchy four page paper”

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Patent Trader, Inc.

    415 F.2d 190 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 22 times

    No. 432, Docket 32743. Argued March 13, 1969. Decided July 29, 1969. Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Baruch A. Fellner, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Hugh P. Husband, Jr., New York City, for respondent. Before MOORE and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges and McLEAN, District Judge. Of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. MOORE, Circuit Judge:

  7. TEX TAN WELHAUSEN COMPANY v. N.L.R.B

    419 F.2d 1265 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 15 times

    No. 26338. November 21, 1969. Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 12, 1970. Theo F. Weiss, Clemens, Knight, Weiss Spencer, San Antonio, Tex., for petitioners. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Clifford Potter, Director, Region 23, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., Joseph A. Yablonski, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, William Wachter, Attorney, N.L.R.B., for respondents. Fred

  8. United Steelworkers of America v. N.L.R.B

    390 F.2d 846 (D.C. Cir. 1967)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 20336, 20514. Argued March 16, 1967. Decided December 27, 1967. As Amended April 26, 1968. Certiorari Denied May 6, 1968. See 88 S.Ct. 1654. Mr. Michael Gottesman, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Elliot Bredhoff, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 20,336 and intervenor in No. 20,514. Mr. Robert D. Douglas, Jr., Greensboro, N.C., of the bar of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Bartholomew A. Diggins and Daniel

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Exchange Parts Company

    339 F.2d 829 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 14 times

    No. 21204. January 5, 1965. Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, A. Brummel, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Karl H. Mueller, Harold E. Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., Jean Allard, Chicago, Ill., for respondents, Mueller Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., of counsel. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and BROWN and GEWIN, Circuit Judges. TUTTLE, Chief Judge. The Board seeks enforcement

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Arkansas Rice Growers Coop. Ass'n

    400 F.2d 565 (8th Cir. 1968)   Cited 9 times

    No. 19088. August 23, 1968. Jerome Weinstein, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Janet Kohn, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief. B.S. Clark, of Smith, Williams, Friday Bowen, Little Rock, Ark., for respondent. Before MATTHES, GIBSON and LAY, Circuit Judges. LAY, Circuit Judge. The Board seeks enforcement of its order for collective bargaining, finding the Company, Arkansas