§
A. S. Abell Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Board v. Hearst Publications

    322 U.S. 111 (1944)   Cited 791 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Determining whether newsboys were independent contractors or employees under the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA")

  2. United States v. Silk

    331 U.S. 704 (1947)   Cited 541 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that truck drivers who owned their own trucks and hired their own helpers were "small businessmen" who were properly classified as independent contractors

  3. Mitchell v. Tribune Company

    342 U.S. 919 (1952)   Cited 90 times
    Employing the "target area" approach

  4. National Van Lines, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    273 F.2d 402 (7th Cir. 1960)   Cited 21 times
    In National Van Lines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, the Seventh Circuit concluded that the contract-drivers were independent contractors.

  5. Williams v. United States

    126 F.2d 129 (7th Cir. 1942)   Cited 45 times
    In Williams v. United States, 7 Cir., 126 F.2d 129, 132 this Court pointed out that there is a "considerable contrariety of opinion" as to the elements in the common law test.

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Nu-Car Carriers

    189 F.2d 756 (3d Cir. 1951)   Cited 26 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Nu-Car Carriers, Inc., 189 F.2d 756 (3rd Cir. 1951), cert. den., 342 U.S. 919, 72 S.Ct. 367, 96 L.Ed. 687 (1952), workers who leased tractors from a corporation were held to be employees, on the grounds that express contractual provisions placing the workers under the direction and supervision of the corporation were enforced by supervisors who checked up on the quality of their driving, discharged, and at times assigned routes to the workers.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Steinberg

    182 F.2d 850 (5th Cir. 1950)   Cited 26 times

    No. 12814. June 7, 1950. Rehearing Denied July 17, 1950. C. Paul Barker, Special Counsel, National Labor Relations Bd., New Orleans, La., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Haywood H. Hillyer, Jr., New Orleans, La., for respondent. Before HOLMES, McCORD and BORAH, Circuit Judges. BORAH, Circuit Judge. The question here is whether certain named fur trappers are employees of respondents