§

A. E. Nettleton Co.

108 N.L.R.B. 1670 (N.L.R.B. 1954)
A. E. Nettleton Co.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 507 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  2. Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

    343 U.S. 395 (1952)   Cited 269 times
    Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"

  3. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 118 times
    In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natl. Shoes

    208 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 29 times
    Deciding that the employerengaged in an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8 where the record contained evidence of “[l]ong delays unaccounted for in the matter of correspondence and the preparation of documents, the postponement of meetings of the negotiators for weeks at a time, and the reopening of questions previously settled”

  6. National L. Rel. Bd. v. Syracuse Color P

    209 F.2d 596 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 21 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Syracuse Color Press, Inc., 2 Cir., 209 F.2d 596, we have upheld the Board in finding coercion in the pointed cross-examination of five employees as to union organizing activities within the plant.

  7. Great Southern Trucking Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    127 F.2d 180 (4th Cir. 1942)   Cited 35 times
    In Great Southern Trucking Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 127 F.2d 180, 185, we said: "An employer may not have a mind `hermetically sealed' against the acceptance of the proper procedure of collective bargaining in good faith; nor may an employer engage in such Fabian tactics as will practically render abortive the statutory rights of the employees."

  8. Globe Cotton Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    103 F.2d 91 (5th Cir. 1939)   Cited 39 times
    In Globe Cotton Mills v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 103 F.2d 91, 94, the court said: "there is a duty on both sides * * * to enter into discussion with an open and fair mind, and a sincere purpose to find a basis of agreement touching wages and hours and conditions of labor, and if found to embody it in a contract as specific as possible, which shall stand as a mutual guaranty of conduct, and as a guide for the adjustment of grievances."

  9. National Labor Rel. B. v. O'Keefe Merritt M

    178 F.2d 445 (9th Cir. 1949)   Cited 19 times
    Listing seven cases

  10. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Katz Drug Co.

    207 F.2d 168 (8th Cir. 1953)   Cited 5 times

    No. 14782. September 17, 1953. Thomas J. McDermott, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., with him on the brief), for petitioner. Lawrence R. Brown, Kansas City, Mo. (Myron K. Ellison, John K. Bestor and Stinson, Mag, Thomson, McEvers Fizzell, Kansas City, Mo., with him on the brief), for respondent