§

A-Diamond Glass And Board-Up Co , [Alleged] Alter Ego And/Or Successor Of Apple Glass Co.

293 N.L.R.B. 700 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
A-Diamond Glass And Board-Up Co , [Alleged] Alter Ego And/Or Successor Of Apple Glass Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 497 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  4. Southport Pet., Co. v. N.L.R.B

    315 U.S. 100 (1942)   Cited 187 times
    Ruling that dissolution of company and transfer of assets did not prevent enforcement of a Board order

  5. Goodman Piping Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    741 F.2d 10 (2d Cir. 1984)   Cited 76 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding common ownership when the predecessor was corporation wholly owned by the husband and the successor corporation by the wife

  6. Alkire v. N.L.R.B

    716 F.2d 1014 (4th Cir. 1983)   Cited 48 times
    Analyzing similar issue on an alter ego theory

  7. Fugazy Continental Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    725 F.2d 1416 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 23 times
    Affirming alter ego finding where only portion of company's operations were shut and transferred to a new, "sham" company established to perform the same work

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Greyhound Corp.

    368 F.2d 778 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying the Supreme Court's standard to hold that Greyhound and the independent contractor were joint employers

  9. National Labor Rel. Board v. M.P. Bldg. Corp.

    411 F.2d 567 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 4 times

    No. 26473. May 14, 1969. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Clifford Potter, Director, Region 23, Houston, Tex., Ronald R. Helveston, Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Michael N. Sohn, Burton L. Raimi, Attys., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Hugh G. Freeland, Lavon L. Jones, Beaumont, Tex., for respondents. Before BELL and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges, and CHOATE, Senior District Judge. PER CURIAM: This case is before the Court

  10. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,874 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions