§

A and G, Inc.,d/b/a Alstyle Apparel

351 N.L.R.B. 1287 (N.L.R.B. 2007)
A and G, Inc.,d/b/a Alstyle Apparel

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,036 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. National Labor Rel. B. v. Kentucky R. Comm. C

    532 U.S. 706 (2001)   Cited 180 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden of proving a statutory exception generally falls on the party who claims a benefit

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 20 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"

  5. Chinese v. Natl. Labor

    224 F. App'x 6 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 06-1159, 06-1206. April 24, 2007. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Steven D. Atkinson, Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud Romo, Cerritos, CA, for Petitioner. Robert J. Englehart, Attorney, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Assistant General Counsel, Ronald E. Meisburg, David A. Fleischer, Senior Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, (NLRB) General Counsel, Washington, DC, for

  6. Midwest Regional Joint Bd. v. N.L.R.B

    564 F.2d 434 (D.C. Cir. 1977)   Cited 27 times

    Nos. 76-1067 and 76-1198. Argued March 31, 1977. Decided June 24, 1977. Vivian I. Schorman, New York City, for petitioner in No. 76-1067. Arthur M. Goldberg, Washington, D.C., was on the brief for petitioner in No. 76-1067. William H. Emer, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner in No. 76-1198 and intervenor in No. 76-1067. Jay E. Shanklin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel