§
A & A Tile Co.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Strong

    393 U.S. 357 (1969)   Cited 115 times
    Explaining that, though broad, the NLRA's grant of remedial power "does not authorize punitive measures"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.

    385 U.S. 421 (1967)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”

  4. Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. N.L.R.B

    418 F.2d 203 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 1 times

    No. 23493. September 10, 1969. Arthur J. Schlanger (argued), Boise, Idaho, for petitioner. Herman Levy (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Solomon I. Hirsh, Charles R. Both, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Hugh Hafer and John E. Rinehart, Jr., of Bassett, Donaldson Hafer, Seattle, Wash., for intervenor. Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge Honorable Charles L. Powell, United