A A Electric Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
  2. Nash v. Florida Industrial Comm'n

    389 U.S. 235 (1967)   Cited 141 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding preempted an administrative policy interpreting presumably valid state unemployment insurance law exception for "labor disputes" to include proceedings under NLRB complaints
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Ritchie Manufacturing Company

    354 F.2d 90 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 34 times

    No. 17978. December 14, 1965. As Corrected on Denial of Rehearing January 11, 1966. Gary Green, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, on the brief, for petitioner. Rex J. Ryden, of Cartwright, Druker, Ryden Fagg, Marshalltown; Iowa, H.G. Cartwright, of Cartwright, Druker, Ryden Fagg, Marshalltown, Iowa, for respondent. Before VOGEL, Chief Judge, and VAN OOSTERHOUT and MEHAFFY

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. W.B. Jones Lumber

    245 F.2d 388 (9th Cir. 1957)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that "[t]he Board is not required to observe the legal rules of evidence as are common law courts," and thus, "the evidence offered was admissible even though it may have involved hearsay"
  6. Hoover Design Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    402 F.2d 987 (6th Cir. 1968)   Cited 7 times
    In Hoover Design Corp. v. NLRB, 402 F.2d 987 (6th Cir. 1968), this Court ruled that the discharge of an employee for threatening to go to the Board or threatening to file charges with the Board did not constitute a violation of § 8(a)(4).
  7. Pedersen v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    234 F.2d 417 (2d Cir. 1956)   Cited 15 times

    No. 273, Docket 23888. Argued March 14, 1956. Decided June 7, 1956. Emanuel Friedman, New York City (Sidney S. Grant, Grant Angoff, Boston, Mass., of counsel on the brief), for petitioner. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel; Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman and Rose Mary Filipowicz, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Myron P. Gordon, New York City, for intervenor. Before FRANK, LUMBARD and WATERMAN

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Union of Operating Engineers Local 12

    243 F.2d 134 (9th Cir. 1957)   Cited 1 times

    No. 15151. April 10, 1957. Theophill C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallett-Prevost, Asst., Norton J. Come and William J. Avrutis, Washington, D.C., Henry W. Becker, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. David Sokol, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees. Before CHAMBERS and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges, and WESTOVER, District Judge. CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge. This is a secondary boycott case. See Section 8(b)(4)(A) and (B) of the National Labor-Management Relations Act. 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq. In the background