§

______________, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area), Agency.

01a40694 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 28, 2005)
______________, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area), Agency.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 243,637 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is appropriate when the evidence is "so one-sided that one party must prevail as a matter of law"

  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 222,684 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"

  3. Sanchez v. Standard Brands, Inc.

    431 F.2d 455 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 1,412 times
    Holding scope of complaint "limited to the 'scope' of the EEOC investigation which can reasonably be expected to grow out of the charge of discrimination."

  4. Oliver v. Digital Equipment Corp.

    846 F.2d 103 (1st Cir. 1988)   Cited 413 times
    Holding that discharge over two and one half years after employee filed EEOC complaint was insufficient showing of retaliation to avoid summary judgment for employer