24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc.
15 Cited authorities
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
563 U.S. 333 (2011) Cited 3,981 times 605 Legal AnalysesHolding that a ban on collective-action waivers in those contracts worked to "disfavor arbitration"
Discover Bank v. Superior Court
36 Cal.4th 148 (Cal. 2005) Cited 480 times 71 Legal AnalysesHolding that, under some circumstances, class action waivers in consumer arbitration agreements are unconscionable
Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
437 U.S. 556 (1978) Cited 196 times 13 Legal AnalysesHolding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity
J.I. Case Co. v. Labor Board
321 U.S. 332 (1944) Cited 457 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that the result of a collective bargaining agreement is not "a contract of employment except in rare cases; no one has a job by reason of it and no obligation to any individual ordinarily comes into existence from it alone"
Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.
309 U.S. 350 (1940) Cited 318 times 5 Legal AnalysesHolding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA
Labor Board v. Electrical Workers
346 U.S. 464 (1953) Cited 125 times 41 Legal AnalysesUpholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute
Guardsmark, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
475 F.3d 369 (D.C. Cir. 2007) Cited 17 times 2 Legal AnalysesStriking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally
N.L.R.B. v. Oakes Mach. Corp.
897 F.2d 84 (2d Cir. 1990) Cited 22 times 1 Legal AnalysesListing reasonableness as one of four factors in determining whether the termination of supervisors affected terms and conditions of employees
Lewis v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc.
No. B227869 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 3, 2011) Cited 1 timesB227869 11-03-2011 KEVIN LEWIS et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. 24 HOUR FITNESS USA, INC., Defendant and Appellant. Littler Mendelson, Keith A. Jacoby, Brandie N. Charles and Judy M. Iriye for Defendant and Appellant. Law Offices of Stephen Glick, Stephen Glick and Anthony Jenkins for Plaintiffs and Respondents. TURNER NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
Sahara Datsun, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
811 F.2d 1317 (9th Cir. 1987) Cited 5 timesDetermining that an organization qualified as a labor organization because its purpose was to negotiate with an employer
Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Cited 363,155 times 962 Legal AnalysesGranting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
Section 201 - Short title
29 U.S.C. § 201 Cited 21,563 times 104 Legal AnalysesSetting fourteen as the minimum age for most non-agricultural work
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,101 times 34 Legal AnalysesFinding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"
Section 102 - Public policy in labor matters declared
29 U.S.C. § 102 Cited 150 timesDeclaring public policy underlying Norris-LaGuardia