Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-54b

Current with legislation from the 2023 Regular and Special Sessions.

Section 53a-54b - Murder with special circumstances

A person is guilty of murder with special circumstances who is convicted of any of the following and was eighteen years of age or older at the time of the offense:

(1) Murder of a member of the Division of State Police within the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection or of any local police department, a chief inspector or inspector in the Division of Criminal Justice, a state marshal who is exercising authority granted under any provision of the general statutes, a judicial marshal in performance of the duties of a judicial marshal, a constable who performs criminal law enforcement duties, a special policeman appointed under section 29-18, a conservation officer or special conservation officer appointed by the Commissioner of Energy and Environmental Protection under the provisions of section 26-5, an employee of the Department of Correction or a person providing services on behalf of said department when such employee or person is acting within the scope of such employee's or person's employment or duties in a correctional institution or facility and the actor is confined in such institution or facility, or any firefighter, while such victim was acting within the scope of such victim's duties;

(2) murder committed by a defendant who is hired to commit the same for pecuniary gain or murder committed by one who is hired by the defendant to commit the same for pecuniary gain;

(3) murder committed by one who has previously been convicted of intentional murder or of murder committed in the course of commission of a felony;

(4) murder committed by one who was, at the time of commission of the murder, under sentence of life imprisonment;

(5) murder by a kidnapper of a kidnapped person during the course of the kidnapping or before such person is able to return or be returned to safety;

(6) murder committed in the course of the commission of sexual assault in the first degree;

(7) murder of two or more persons at the same time or in the course of a single transaction; or

(8) murder of a person under sixteen years of age.

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-54b

(P.A. 73-137, S. 3; P.A. 77-604, S. 39, 84; 77-614, S. 486, 610; P.A. 80-335; P.A. 85-144; P.A. 92-260, S. 27; P.A. 95-16, S. 4; P.A. 98-126, S. 1; P.A. 00-99, S. 120, 154; P.A. 01-84, S. 10, 26; 01-151, S. 3, 5; P.A. 11-51, S. 134; 11-80, S. 1; P.A. 12-5, S. 1; P.A. 15-84, S. 7.)

Amended by P.A. 15-0084, S. 7 of the Connecticut Acts of the 2015 Regular Session, eff. 10/1/2015.

Amended by P.A. 12-0005, S. 1 of the the 2012 Regular Session, eff. 4/25/2012.

Cited. 194 C. 416; 198 Conn. 92; 199 Conn. 163; 201 Conn. 276; 211 Conn. 289; 215 Conn. 570; 216 C. 699; 218 C. 486; 230 Conn. 183; 234 Conn. 324; Id., 735; 235 Conn. 206; 237 Conn. 332; 238 Conn. 389; Id., 828; 240 Conn. 727; 241 C. 702; 242 Conn. 409. Murder in the course of kidnapping does not require ransom; murder in the course of sexual assault includes murder to prevent victim from becoming a witness; denial of a bill of particulars on aggravating factors did not deny fair hearing; meaning of "heinous" and "depraved" discussed; "heinous, cruel or depraved" as a unitary rather than three separate factors discussed; statute complies with the eighth and fourteenth amendments; statutory construction and precedent support conclusion that the burden of persuasion applies to both elements of mitigation; proportionality review still available in this case despite repeal of requirement. 251 C. 285. Trial court properly instructed jury that it could convict defendant of capital felony based upon a theory of conspiratorial liability even though defendant did not pull trigger of gun that killed victims and was not present when the shootings occurred. 271 Conn. 338. Cited. 32 CA 38; 36 Conn.App. 364; 41 Conn.App. 604; 42 Conn.App. 348; 43 CA 549; 45 CA 207; Id., 390. Cited 42 Conn.Supp. 426. Subdiv. (1): Conviction for felony murder under Sec. 53a-54c cannot serve as the predicate murder for the crime of capital felony under this section; term "murder" in capital felony statute may be applied only to intentional murder. 241 Conn. 702. In order to satisfy the element that police officer had been "acting within the scope of his duties", the state was only required to prove that police officer was acting in the good faith discharge of his official duties when he stopped defendant and attempted to subdue him. 264 Conn. 1. Subdiv. (2): Capital felony murder discussed. 199 Conn. 163. Cited. 203 Conn. 420. Evidence that codefendant said "I've got a job for you" and that defendant made preparations for the murder and received a snowmobile after the victim was killed was sufficient to support finding of probable cause that defendant committed murder for pecuniary gain; defendant, having been hired to kill the victim, could be held accessorily liable for capital felony under Subdiv. even if jury found that codefendant, who was not a party to any hiring relationship, was the principal actor who killed the victim; hiring element contemplates a bargained for exchange involving pecuniary gain as consideration for the commission of the murder, and the mere receipt of money or property before or after the murder is not sufficient to hold defendant liable under Subdiv. 305 Conn. 101, but see 318 Conn. 1. Cited. 19 Conn.App. 111; judgment reversed, see 215 Conn. 538. Subdiv. (5): Cited. 197 Conn. 436; 213 C. 388. Provision does not require that kidnapping be accompanied by a demand for ransom. 249 Conn. 645. Trial court properly instructed jury that its verdict of guilty on charge of intentional murder would provide the predicate for criminal liability under Subdiv. 263 C. 478. Subdiv. (6): Cited. 233 Conn. 174. State need only prove that the murder in a kidnap-murder or sexual-assault murder was aggravated in order to establish the aggravating factor. 269 Conn. 213. Subdiv. (7): Cited. 205 C. 298; 237 Conn. 694. Double jeopardy clause not violated where defendant convicted for two counts of capital felony; evidence indicated that the murders occurred in two sets, at distinctly separate times. 260 C. 339. Subdiv. (8): Cited. 206 Conn. 213; 207 Conn. 374; 208 Conn. 125; 209 Conn. 225; 212 Conn. 258; 213 Conn. 708; 218 Conn. 349; 221 Conn. 430; 229 Conn. 125; 233 Conn. 813. Only an intentional murder can be a predicate murder to capital felony charge under section. 238 Conn. 828. Cited. 241 Conn. 322; Id., 702; 242 Conn. 93. Proper construction to be given to term "in the course of a single transaction" is that there need only be some nexus between murders, that the murders be connected by a common purpose or plan in order to be "in the course of a single transaction"; does not require murders to be at the same time in order to constitute "in the course of a single transaction"; temporal relationship between murders is not an absolute prerequisite to prosecution under Subdiv. 254 C. 578. Read together, Sec. 53a-54(a) and this Subdiv. provide that conviction of intentional murder under doctrine of transferred intent may be the predicate for conviction of capital felony under this Subdiv. when victim is under 16, regardless of defendant's subjective state of mind; knowledge of the victim's age is not an element of Subdiv.; to limit applicability of Subdiv. to cases in which state can prove that defendant knew or reasonably should have known the age of his victim would be both impracticable and inconsistent with the legislative intent. 265 Conn. 35. Legislature had rational basis for classifying intentional murder of a person under the age of 16 as a capital felony. 272 Conn. 106. Cited. 38 CA 581.

See Sec. 53a-54a re murder. See Sec. 53a-54c re felony murder. See Sec. 53a-54e re construction of statutes re capital felony committed prior to April 25, 2012.