Rule 60 - Relief From Judgment or Order(a) Clerical Mistakes. Clerical mistakes in judgments, orders, or other parts of the record and errors therein arising from oversight or omission may be corrected by the court at any time of its own initiative or on the motion of any party and after such notice, if any, as the court orders. During the pendency of an appeal or petition for review to the Supreme Court, such mistakes may be so corrected before the record is filed in the Supreme Court, and thereafter may be so corrected with leave of the Supreme Court. For purposes of this rule, the record includes electronic information maintained about the case. (b) Mistakes -- Inadvertence -- Excusable Neglect -- Newly Discovered Evidence -- Fraud -- Etc. On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or a party's legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons:(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b); (3) fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party;(4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application; or(6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment. The motion shall be made within a reasonable time, and for reasons (1), (2) and (3) not more than one year after the date of notice of the judgment or orders as defined in Civil Rule 58.1(c). A motion under this subdivision (b) does not affect the finality of a judgment or suspend its operation. This rule does not limit the power of a court to entertain an independent action to relieve a party from a judgment, order or proceeding, or to grant relief to a defendant not personally served, or to set aside a judgment for fraud upon the court. Writs of coram nobis, coram vobis and audita querela are abolished, and the procedure for obtaining any relief from a judgment shall be by motion as prescribed in these rules or by an independent action.
(c) Form of Amended or Corrected Judgments. A motion to amend or correct a judgment must be accompanied by a proposed amended or corrected judgment and a separate proposed order. The new judgment must include the word "amended" or "corrected" in the title. Adopted by SCO 5 10/9/1959; amended by SCO 554 effective 4/4/1983; by SCO 1153 effective 7/15/1994; by SCO 1361 effective 10/15/1999; by SCO 1415 effective 10/15/2000; and by SCO 1622 effective 10/15/2006; and by SCO 1670 effective 7/1/2009.This rule is not a substitute for a party filing a timely appeal; nor does it allow relitigation of issues that have been resolved by the judgment. Morris v. Morris, Op. No. 4298, 908 P2d 425 (Alaska 1995).
Note: Chapter 42 § 2 SLA 1999 enacts AS 09.19.200 which governs the remedies available in civil litigation involving conditions in correctional facilities. According to § 3 of the act, the enactment of AS 09.19.200 has the effect of amending Civil Rules 59(f), 60(b), 62, and 65 by altering the remedies available and the procedure to be used in litigation involving correctional facilities.
Note: Chapter 92 SLA 2008 (HB 65) added a new chapter to AS 45 relating to security of personal information, effective July 1, 2009. According to section 6(a) of the Act, AS 45.48.640, enacted by section 4, has the effect of changing Civil Rule 60(b) by allowing a court to vacate an order on its own motion and at any time and by establishing a specific criterion for vacating the order under AS 45.48.640.