From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolfe v. Ross

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Nov 4, 2015
125 A.3d 408 (Pa. 2015)

Opinion

No. 221 WAL 2015

11-04-2015

Theresa M. WOLFE, Administratrix of the Estate of Kevin T. Wolfe, Petitioner v. Robert ROSS, Respondent v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Respondent.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of November, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

(1) Whether a clause in a homeowner's insurance policy, excluding coverage for liability for bodily injury “arising out of the ownership, maintenance [or] use ... of a motor vehicle owned or operated by ... any insured” is ambiguous where the homeowner's liability is based solely upon his negligence in supplying alcohol to an underage person, and no insured committed any tortious act related to any vehicle.

(2) Whether the independent concurrent cause rule should be adopted as the law of Pennsylvania.


Summaries of

Wolfe v. Ross

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Nov 4, 2015
125 A.3d 408 (Pa. 2015)
Case details for

Wolfe v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:THERESA M. WOLFE, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF KEVIN T. WOLFE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Nov 4, 2015

Citations

125 A.3d 408 (Pa. 2015)