From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Windham v. American Brands

U.S.
Apr 17, 1978
435 U.S. 968 (1978)

Summary

holding that bifurcation is appropriate where it "could remove or even alleviate" an "overwhelming burden of damage mini-trials"

Summary of this case from Jaroslawicz v. Engelhard Corp.

Opinion

No. 77-925.

April 17, 1978, OCTOBER TERM, 1977.


C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 565 F. 2d 59.


Summaries of

Windham v. American Brands

U.S.
Apr 17, 1978
435 U.S. 968 (1978)

holding that bifurcation is appropriate where it "could remove or even alleviate" an "overwhelming burden of damage mini-trials"

Summary of this case from Jaroslawicz v. Engelhard Corp.

denying access to the names and addresses of jurors because the documents were not part of the public record

Summary of this case from State v. Pennell

applying Dorszynski retroactively in cases of pending direct appeals but not in cases of collateral attack

Summary of this case from Puente v. United States

standing satisfied where media arguably suffered an injury with respect to news gathering and trial court order arguably affected media's rights under the First Amendment

Summary of this case from News American v. State

testing procedure

Summary of this case from Attorney General v. Waldron
Case details for

Windham v. American Brands

Case Details

Full title:WINDHAM et al. v. AMERICAN BRANDS, Inc., et al

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 17, 1978

Citations

435 U.S. 968 (1978)

Citing Cases

Brown v. Cameron-Brown Co.

Whether the burden has been met is left to the trial court's discretion and will be reversed only for abuse.…

Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co.

In United States v. Gurney, 558 F.2d 1202, 1210 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied sub nom. Miami Herald…