From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitman v. City of Burton

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 2, 2012
811 N.W.2d 490 (Mich. 2012)

Opinion

Docket No. 143475.COA No. 294703.

2012-05-2

Bruce WHITMAN, Plaintiff–Appellant/Cross–Appellee, v. CITY OF BURTON and Charles Smiley, Defendants–Appellees/Cross–Appellants.


Prior report: 293 Mich.App. 220, 810 N.W.2d 71.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 5, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellants are considered, and they are GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed whether Shallal v. Catholic Social Services of Wayne County, 455 Mich. 604, 566 N.W.2d 571 (1997), correctly held that the primary motivation of an employee pursuing a whistleblower claim must be a desire to inform the public on matters of public concern, as opposed to personal vindictiveness.

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.


Summaries of

Whitman v. City of Burton

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 2, 2012
811 N.W.2d 490 (Mich. 2012)
Case details for

Whitman v. City of Burton

Case Details

Full title:Bruce WHITMAN, Plaintiff–Appellant/Cross–Appellee, v. CITY OF BURTON and…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: May 2, 2012

Citations

811 N.W.2d 490 (Mich. 2012)
491 Mich. 913

Citing Cases

Whitman v. City of Burton

We ordered the parties to brief “whether Shallal v. Catholic Social Servs. of Wayne Co., 455 Mich. 604, 566…

Harris v. River Rouge Hous. Comm'n

The Michigan Supreme Court has granted leave to appeal the Michigan Court of Appeal's decision in Whitman,…