From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watts v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 1, 1968
161 S.E.2d 516 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)

Opinion

43528.

SUBMITTED MARCH 6, 1968.

DECIDED APRIL 1, 1968.

Larceny. Rabun Superior Court. Before Judge Smith.

Oliver, Oliver Rea, Robert F. Oliver, for appellant.

Herbert B. Kimzey, Solicitor General, for appellee.


The defendant was convicted of larceny from a house. This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence. Held;

1. "Section 13 of an Act of 1966 (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 567, 571; Code Ann. § 27-313) established a procedure for the suppression of evidence obtained by unlawful search and seizure and provided that a motion to suppress `shall be in writing and state facts showing wherein the search and seizure were unlawful.' Defendant's failure to interpose a timely motion to suppress pursuant to the Act amounted to a waiver of the constitutional guaranty in respect to the search and seizure involved in this case. See Ann. 50 ALR2d 531, 583-592. Gilmore v. State, 117 Ga. App. 67, 68 ( 159 S.E.2d 474). Accordingly, the trial court did not err in permitting the introduction in evidence of a billfold containing money allegedly stolen in the larceny over objections by the defendant that it was obtained by an illegal search of his person during an illegal arrest.

2. The billfold containing the money and the money being sufficiently identified, there was no error in admitting them in evidence.

3. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict. The trial court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed. Jordan, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.

SUBMITTED MARCH 6, 1968 — DECIDED APRIL 1, 1968.


Summaries of

Watts v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 1, 1968
161 S.E.2d 516 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)
Case details for

Watts v. State

Case Details

Full title:WATTS v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 1, 1968

Citations

161 S.E.2d 516 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)
161 S.E.2d 516

Citing Cases

West v. State

His failure to comply with the provisions of Code Ann. § 27-313 by interposing a written motion to suppress…

Thomas v. State

However, this court has held that the motion must be timely made or else it is waived. Gilmore v. State, 117…