holding that a district court abused its discretion in denying a losing civil rights plaintiff's motion to re-tax costs without considering the plaintiff's limited financial resources; and “the chilling effect of imposing such high costs on future civil rights litigants”
Summary of this case from Moton v. Park Christian Sch.No. 99-588.
November 29, 1999, OCTOBER TERM, 1999.
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 168 F. 3d 216.
holding that a district court abused its discretion in denying a losing civil rights plaintiff's motion to re-tax costs without considering the plaintiff's limited financial resources; and “the chilling effect of imposing such high costs on future civil rights litigants”
Summary of this case from Moton v. Park Christian Sch.Full title:VICTORIA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL. v. HARRIS ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Nov 29, 1999
In order to prevail on a First Amendment retaliation claim, Plaintiff must establish that: (1) he suffered an…
Wentzel v. Williams Scotsman Inc.To establish a prima facie case under the EPA, Plaintiff must "show[] that employees of the opposite sex were…