From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Venable v. Virga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 3, 2015
NO. CV 13-7458-VAP(AS) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2015)

Opinion

NO. CV 13-7458-VAP(AS)

08-03-2015

MAURICE LEON VENABLE, Petitioner, v. TIM VIRGA, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge to which no objections were filed. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the Petition with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein on counsel for Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

DATED: August 3, 2015

/s/_________

VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Venable v. Virga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 3, 2015
NO. CV 13-7458-VAP(AS) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2015)
Case details for

Venable v. Virga

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE LEON VENABLE, Petitioner, v. TIM VIRGA, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 3, 2015

Citations

NO. CV 13-7458-VAP(AS) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2015)

Citing Cases

Harrell v. Allison

Thus, to the extent Petitioner contends the prosecutor violated state law in failing to timely turn over the…