From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Forest Serv. v. Pac. Rivers Council

Supreme Court of the United States
Jun 17, 2013
570 U.S. 901 (2013)

Summary

explaining that a BA cannot take the place of analysis required in an EIS but treating the two as analytically similar

Summary of this case from Native Ecosystems Council v. Marten

Opinion

No. 12–623.

2013-06-17

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, et al., petitioners, v. PACIFIC RIVERS COUNCIL, et al.


Case below, 689 F.3d 1012.

Motion of respondent Pacific Rivers Council to vacate judgment below and dismiss as moot granted. Judgment below vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with directions that it instruct the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California to dismiss the case as moot in its entirety.


Summaries of

U.S. Forest Serv. v. Pac. Rivers Council

Supreme Court of the United States
Jun 17, 2013
570 U.S. 901 (2013)

explaining that a BA cannot take the place of analysis required in an EIS but treating the two as analytically similar

Summary of this case from Native Ecosystems Council v. Marten
Case details for

U.S. Forest Serv. v. Pac. Rivers Council

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, et al., petitioners, v. PACIFIC RIVERS…

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jun 17, 2013

Citations

570 U.S. 901 (2013)
133 S. Ct. 2843
186 L. Ed. 2d 881
81 U.S.L.W. 3686

Citing Cases

California ex rel. Imperial Cnty. Air Pollution Control Dist. v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior

Plaintiffs also contend that the Secretary too heavily incorporated indirect impact analysis when discussing…

Ouachita Watch League v. U.S. Forest Serv.

Nor are we persuaded that this case is like Pacific Rivers Council v. United States Forest Service , on which…